The woman sued Amazon for $30 million and said the enterprise became also partly accountable for now not ensuring the hoverboard is secure by informing clients of the ability dangers that they knew existed. This week, the judge has dismissed the case towards Amazon, stating that the role of the e-commerce website become only that of a middleman.
This isn’t always the primary time that Amazon has gained the courtroom case in opposition to the customers who’ve sued the online retail giant for not ensuring the product’s protection or excellent. The family is considering appealing the decision’s ruling. inner files display that Amazon knew that hoverboard could motive issues. back in 2015, a girl sold a retractable dog leash from Amazon that hit her in the face leaving her in part blind. Even in that case, choose believed that Amazon isn’t responsible as the employer is only responsible for connecting sellers with potential customers.
well, it isn’t always just about the security and protection associated court cases that Amazon has been prevailing. back in 2013, Amazon confronted an intellectual belongings lawsuit with the aid of pillowcase maker, Milo, and Gabby which sued Amazon for listing knockoffs. court docket stated Amazon isn’t the seller and consequently it has no obligation concerning infringement.
Being the second maximum treasured organization, Amazon is pronounced to have accounted for forty-four % of u.s.e-trade income the preceding 12 months. however, Amazon appears to be inefficient while in comparison with the protection that is offered by way of traditional retail consumers. With superb energy comes outstanding responsibility, it’s miles high time that Amazon realizes this and takes effective steps in opposition to making sure wide-ranging safety of its clients.